THE ISSUES OF IDEOLOGIES AND POLICIES ON EDUCATION.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
To start with, development of any nation and its
outstanding achievements is subject to the planning and the effective
implementation of education policy. Most governments all over the world are
said to give prominence to educational policies as instruments of national development.
This is not the case in Nigeria as the education policy ever since its
inception in 1982 is suffering of negligence under the unfavorably political
climate of the country, as well as the selfishness of the political leaders. As
such, the trajectory of Nigeria National Education Policy can not be study
without paying attention to some details. According to Umo (2005), worldwide,
education has been recognized as a catalyst for achieving socio-economic,
scientific and technological development. For clarity, the FGN in 2004
announced that education is an instrument par excellence for achieving national
development.
However, the growth and development of a country is
usually an outgrowth of a sound educational planning. Therefore, education is a
vital tool in the germination of a successful society by forming an education
guide, or policy, sets the stage for implementation which Ukeji(1986) considers
as an important aspect of planning. As an independent and developing nation
confronted with the problems of nation building, social integration and
economic development, education is seen and adopted as a means of dealing with
the great problem of national development. It is through education that the
senses of national unity, patriotism, loyalty, etc, are transmitted into
members of the society (Tijani, 2020).
In all, the leadership of Nigeria has been confronted
with the challenge of what educational policy is to be adopted. At a time, the
Colonial master's policy was adopted, at another, the American education policy
was sampled, in fact still in use, forgetting the ethical factor of the Nigeria
state as opposed the single cultural backdrop of many of this developed nation.
However, political dominance further complicates the educational policy of the
country (Karr, 1976). He surmised that the education policy should be
independent of the political process of the country but must be bonded by its
will.
2.1 CONCEPTUAL
DEFINITION OF TERMS
2.1.2 CONCEPT OF POLICY?
According to N.S. Okoroma (2016), policy, serves the
purpose of ensuring that every official action of an organisation must have a
basis or a backing. Also, Terry (1977) considers that “a policy is an overall
guide that gives the general limits and direction in which administrative
action will take place”. From these viewpoints, a policy tells the area that
decisions are to be made but doesn't implement the decision.
2.1.3 Concept of Education?
The term “Education” is simply the training of mind,
not necessarily the regular routine of visiting the classrooms early morning at
school. This is, however, expressed by Osokoya(1987), thus;
Education is a distinctive way in which the society inducts its
young ones into full membership. So every modern society
needs some educational policies to guide it in the process of
such initiation.
In light of the above, education is meant to train,
sensitize and orientate the mind of a given subject at a point as a means of
initiation and instruction. Usually, a dlbody will be saddled with this
responsibility through which the policies will be implemented, an example of
Nigeria National Education Policy Commission.
2.1.4 CONCEPT OF EDUCATIONAL POLICY?
Education policies are initiatives mostly by
governments that determine the direction of an educational system (Okoroma,
2000). In a way, this informs the idea of multifaceted educational policies
situated in the Nigerian context. Of course, there is an overall policy of
education in Nigeria which is 6-3-3-4, which stands for U.B.E., Secondary
Education as well as the Tertiary Education full years respectively. Thus, The
policy introduced the 6-3-3-4 educational system modelled after the American
system of 6 years of primary education, 3 years of junior secondary school, 3
years of senior secondary school, and 4 years of university education (Nwagwu, 2007).
Particularly, the leadership of Nigeria has been
confronted with the challenge of what educational policy is to be adopted. At a
time, the Colonial master's policy was adopted, at another, the American
education policy was sampled, in fact still in use, forgetting the ethical
challenges of the Nigeria state as opposed the single cultural backdrop of many
of this developed nation. Thus, the challenges persist due to the problem of
poor implementation policy, if the plan had at least be considered good enough.
Policy implementation of education, in addition, is
argued to be a conspicuous national problem that has taken centre stage in
Nigeria (Okoroma, 2006). He asserts that to create an education policy that
stand the test of time, some certain characteristics must be focused on, lest
it be deficient. Therefore, he highlighted four (4) vital factors a national
policy on education must have;
·
Reviewability
·
Deficiency
must be expected to allow future amendment
·
Rationality
·
Purposefulness
In the purview of Awokoya (1981), educational policy
is directed towards increasing the quality of life of a people. He believes
that the objective of any policy is to satisfy individual needs, community
pressures and the degree of complexity and sophistication to which socialised personnel
must be educated and trained to meet these demands. The following
considerations, according to Awokoya (1981), should be in place for
successfully designed policy, viz;
1.
It
should be formulated and adopted through a political process which acknowledges
the reality and legitimacy of conflicting interests and desires among its
participants
2.
It
should portray some elements of guidance for properly directed and coordinated
action towards the attainment of the desired goals
3.
It
should contain information on the broad objectives that should be reached
4.
It
should be a binding guide on the actions of those implementing it
5.
It
should be enforceable and enforced by the society which formulates
Talking about Nigeria educational policy, attention
needs be shifted to the fact about the pre-colonial and postcolonial contexts.
Because, there had been modes of education in the pre-colonial empires of the
Nigeria states. Tijani (2020) asserts prior to the British conquest of the area
and the subsequent establishment of Colonial Government, most of the area to
the northern and western parts comprised empires, kingdoms and some chiefdoms,
while in the central parts and south eastern parts there were small chiefdoms
with some semi-autonomous communities. Thus, in the northern parts, Islam was deeply entrenched both in the
religious belief and educational orientation of the people who had a uniform
Qur’anic education policy (Ozigi and Ocho, 1981). In consonance, the southern parts, each ethnic group had
its own traditional form of education based on its own culture and tradition,
whose aims and objectives were similar (Taiwo, 1980).
3.1 A HISTORY OF THE EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN NIGERIA
The emergence of worldwide depression occasioned by
the second World War ignited the agitation of the Nigerian nationalists'
movement for self-government and educational independence. A period known for
its self-determination and education expansion in Nigeria. This development
reinforced the basis for the promulgation of th 1948 education ordainance,
which decentralized educational administration in the country(Tijani, 2020). The colonial government additionally
reviewed its ten years educational plan for Nigeria, and appointed a Director
of Education as well as mapped out a clear cut procedure for assessing
grants-in-aid by mission schools (Fagbunmi, 2005). At a point, the southern
educational system comprised of a four year junior primary education, which was
followed by a four year senior primary education and a six year secondary
education, while in the more established secondary schools, the School
Certificate Examination was taken in Class 5 (Taiwo, 1980). The outcome was the promulgation of the
Education Law of 1955 in the Western Region, the Education Laws of 1956 in the
Eastern and Northern Regions and the Lagos Education Ordinance in 1957
(Taiwo, 1980, Fabunmi, 2005).
Furthermore, prior to 1977 educational policy, Nigeria
operated an educational policy adopted from Britain at independence. But then,
the scheme failed to satisfy the national aspirations of the country, then, was
rendered it unpopular. In 1969 a National Curriculum Conference was organised
which reviewed the inherited curriculum and identified new national goals for
Nigeria’s education. A National Seminar had to be organised by the National
Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) in 1973 under the
Leadership of Chief S. O. Adebo. This resulted to the National Policy on
Education in 1977 (Akangbou 1985; Bello 1986; Okoroma 2000).
The National Policy on Education is benchmarked on
Nigeria’s philosophy on education as identified through the nation’s
objectives. Okoroma (2006) adds that Nigeria has five main national objectives
as provided by the Second National Development Plan and accepted as the
necessary foundation for the National Policy on Education. They are the
building of:
1.
a free and democratic society
2.
a just and
egalitarian society
3.
a united
strong and self-reliant nation
4.
a great and
dynamic economy
5.
a land of
bright and full opportunities for all citizens (FRN, 1998)
The UPE, as a
policy, eliminated
school fees in 1976 intended to have a comparatively limited impact on primary school
enrolments in the educationally developed states, while having large effects on the states lacking
educational development.
In contrast, while primary school enrolment levels increased in both groups
of states, schooling increased faster in the educationally less developed states but this trend was
not commensurate with the population figures. In the North, the
Qur’anic school system with its attendant problems of itinerant pupils
continued to thrive and run parallel with the national educational system
because even though the UPE made primary
education free and universal, no attempt was made to make it compulsory for all
children (Imam, 2003).
However, in the
south, where there was already in place a
policy of universal primary education since the1950s, pupils’ enrolment in
school was the norm and so classroom construction at the primary- School and
teacher-training levels was less prevalent in these states (Osili, 2005).
However, the UPE ended in
September 1981 (Okoroma, 2006). The reason was that the federal government in the revised policy
shed the responsibility it undertook in the 1977 policy to finance primary
education by transferring it to the states and local governments. Nwagwu (2011)
reported a crisis of educational funding brought about by the oil glut in the
world market in the early 1980s which led to a sudden decline in Nigeria’s
revenue from petroleum products that had accounted for approximately 80% of its
income from exports. The result was unpaid teacher salaries, degradation of
education facilities at all levels and strikes in universities and schools
resulting in declining literacy rates in the country (Odukoya, 2009). As a
result, with reduced funding for primary education and school fees
reintroduction in the 1980s, primary enrolments fell or stagnated in some
states (Osili,
2005). Also, instead of the automatic promotion policy of the UPE, a combined
method of evaluation of pupils/students’ performance and certification through
continuous assessments and examinations was introduced. However, this did not
stop the emphasis on certification instead of skills acquisition. There was
also, recognition of the importance of language as a means of preserving the
culture of the people and for forging national unity. Consequently, the 1981 revised policy prescribed that each
child be encouraged to learn one of the three major languages in the country;
Hausa Ibo and Yoruba, other than the mother tongue (Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1981).
4.1 SOME GENERAL CONSTRAINTS ON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
As has already been highlighted,
each of the educational policies has its peculiar bottlenecks when it comes to
the issue of implementation. But over and above such peculiar problems, there
are others that cut across the policies. Such include the problem of leadership
changes; foreign linkage and foreign interference and resource manipulation.
LEADERSHIP
Since the attainment of independence
Nigeria has experienced frequent change in leadership. These leaders have had
their difficulties in both formulating and implementing 'educational policies'.
From the Macpherson constitution of 1954 into the first republic, the regions
were left to formulate and implement educational policies. Thus each region
developed at its own pace. The various military regimes that operated in
Nigeria between 1966 and 1979, formulated and implemented various educational policies
to suit their imagination. The Shagari administration and later the Buhari,
Babangiida and Abacha administrations interpreted educational policies the way
they understood them.
The idea here is that as each
administration assumes power with its own vision, so are the educational
policies twisted to suit their tastes. Just like there is no continuity in the
leadership, so also the educational attitude to implementation frequently
changes. Each successive administration tries to initiate an approach that can
be associated with it. As a result of confusion and conflicting attitudes to
implementation, there is no continuity Nigerians really need. Such crises and
public outcry against it led the head of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to
constitute the Etsu Nupe committee for the Vision 2010.
FOREIGN
LINKAGE
Nigeria is a former British Colony
and although it attained political independence in October 1960, the basic
educational structures and patterns established by the Britished colonialists
have continued to dominate the Nigerian educational scene. Attempts to make
Nigeria retain its rightful place in the British Commonwealth have made it
difficult to introduce and implement radical changes in the educational system.
Even when some relatively radical changes were proposed in the 6 - 3 - 3 - 4,
for example making the educational system practical and functional in nature,
emphasising science and technical education, the implementation has not been
smooth. The process of acquiring the science and technical equipment has not
been an easy task. The foreign powers charged with the responsibility of
supplying these items would not close their eyes to see Nigeria advance to a
level that would challenge their enviable positions.
In all our institutions of learning there
is a large number of untrained teachers. This is against the provision of the
National policy which provided that eventually only trained teachers would be
allowed to teach and that the National Certificate of Education (N C E) would
become the minimum entry qualification to teach at primary school. The year
1998 was later fixed for making N C E minimum qualification for teaching.
However as noted by Nkom (1996) while most primary school teachers in the
southern states have TC II, in the northern states most are without TCII.
FINANCE
The effective implementations of
most educational policies demand high expenditure. This is particularly so for
Nigeria where most of her policies are introduced in such large scale as to
ridicule the countries capacity to perform.
When for example one considers the reason for the failure of Universal
Primary Education Scheme (U P E ) in Nigeria, there was the issue of the
shortage of teachers and supportive staff, lack of physical facilities. In an
attempt to cope with the increasing number of primary school leavers, secondary
schools were deboarded so as to use the feeding money in other areas. But the
deboarding itself came with its own ills like truancy, prostitution,
hooliganism and other vices. The 6 - 3 - 3 - 4 system faces the problem of
infrastructure. The inverse relationship between the needs of our schools and
the resource allocation is even more pronounced in the secondary and tertiary
institutions.
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
Alongside the problem of finance is
the problem of poor resource management. There exist a high number of abandoned
projects in the educational sector. Similarly, the heavy machinery imported for
ensuring science and technical education in Nigeria, have wasted in many school
sites and many of such are wearing and tearing away. Similarly many people who
were sent overseas for training, returned home without being put into proper
use.
Other problems include poor
planning, indiscipline among policy managers, negative attitude to work by
education personnel, poor coordination, and devaluation of the Naira which made
imported educational materials very expensive.
5.1. AREAS
OF ADJUSTMENT /RECOMMENDATIONS
In view of the numerous problem
areas observed, urgent measures must to taken to make the educational system
prepare the citizens for meeting the challenges of the 21st century. Some of
these areas that need for adjustment include:
i. A reassessment of the situation
on the ground in Nigeria vis-a-vis global developments in various facets of
life. This assessment can show problems of the current policy, the needs of the
Nigerian society and economy, and the adjustments required to make Nigerian
educational system functional as desired.
2. Taking appropriate measures to
enforce the Language Policy as contained in the National Policy on Education.
This step can make transition from home to school environment smoother. It will
also help to promote our culture.
3. The issue of teacher- education
must be viewed with greater seriousness- Much of our teacher-education
programmes leave much to be desired. More attention should be given to
strategies for character molding and more time should be given to practicals
bearing in mind that our future teachers are S S C E holders and not TC II.
4. Teaching should be professionalised
such that anyone who wants to be a teacher must be trained in the profession.
5. Science and Technical Education
should be reviewed with a view to making it realistic in the Nigerian
environment especially the rural areas. The content of some senior secondary
school subjects need to be trimmed so as to enable teachers cover it
conveniently in three years.
6. We should cease to be copycats of
other countries' educational system. While relevant elements can be adapted,
those not suiting our situation should be discarded.
7. Government should be seen not
only making appropriate budget allocation, but should also be seen to
appropriately utilise it.
8. Practising teachers at all levels
should be involved in planning any future educational system, since it is they
who implement the policies understand students’ problems. The condition of
service for the teacher should be enhanced to ensure interest in the job.
9. Attention given to special
education is not commensurate with the demands. Those identified as truly
gifted children should be catered for even at the tertiary level. Besides, the
campaign for educating the handicapped should be intensified.
10. Strategies should be developed
to ensure the prudent management of educational resources
(Tijani, 2020).
REFERENCES
·
Tijani,
2020. Philosophy On Nigeria Education and Implementation
·
N. S.
Okoroma, 2006. Educational policies and problems of implementation in Nigeria
·
Afoma Okudo,
2013. National Policy on Education: Problems and Prospects for Teaching and
Learning of Igbo as a Second Language in Nigerian
·, Secondary Schools
Comments
Post a Comment